Strung Out – Songs Of Armor & Devotion (2019)links hosted on Uploaded, Rapidgator, Nitroflare, Mega, Openload, Free, Direct Stream is also available Via putlocker or torrents. 'Devotion' is the fourth studio album by German melodic hard rock band 'Shylock' released in 2007. For those not familiar with the band, 'Shylock', in a way, takes the hugely produced sound found in bands like 'Frontline' while incorporating melodies in the style of 'Bonfire' therefore retaining the very essence of German melodic hard rock.
- Walter Cohen, “The Merchant of Venice and the Possibilities of Historical Criticism,” in New Casebooks: The Merchant of Venice, ed. Martin Coyle (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998), 45–72.Google Scholar
- John Drakakis, “‘Jew, Shylock is my name’: Speech Prefixes in The Merchant of Venice as Symptoms of the Early Modern,” in Shakespeare and Modernity: Early Modern to Millennium, ed. Hugh Grady (London: Routledge, 2000), 105–121.Google Scholar
- For other interpretations that rely on transitional schemas or that find symptoms of a market economy in the play, see Michael Nerlich, Ideology of Adventure: Studies in Modern Consciousness, 1100–1750, vol. 1, trans. Ruth Crowley (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), chap. 7;Google Scholar
- and Frederick Turner, Shakespeare’s Twenty-First Century Economics: The Morality of Love and Money (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), chap. 5.Google Scholar
- Eric Roll, A History of Economic Thought (London: Faber and Faber, 1938), 46.Google Scholar
- Odd Langholm, Price and Value in the Aristotelian Tradition: A Study in Scholastic Economic Sources (Norwegian Research Council for Science and the Humanities, 1979), 32.Google Scholar
- For an earlier critique of the theory of intrinsic value, see Joseph A. Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis (New York: Oxford University Press, 1954), 60–62.Google Scholar
- Hannah Robie Sewall, The Theory of Value Before Adam Smith, in Publications of the American Economic Association, Third Series, vol. II, n. 3 (New York: Macmillan Company, 1901), 15.Google Scholar
- On the relationship between labor and the just price see Lewis H. Haney, History of Economic Thought (New York: Macmillan Company, 1949), 99–100; Raymond de Roover, “The Concept of the Just Price: Theory and Economic Policy,” Journal of Economic History 18 (1958): 418–434; and Langholm, Price and Value, 61–84.Google Scholar
- Karl Marx, Capital III (New York: International Publishers, 1967), 378Google Scholar
- cited in Jon Elster, Making Sense of Marx (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), 489. As Elster remarks, “Although the view that money might generate profit independently of production is indeed preposterous, it was the foundation of mercantilist reasoning for a long time. We find the seventeenth-century cameralists arguing that wars would never run an economy down so long as the money remained in the country, as if soldiers could be fed on gold and silver” (489).Google Scholar
- Thomas Mun, England’s Treasure by Forraign Trade (London, 1663), 20, cited in Bruno Suviranta, The Theory of the Balance of Trade in England: A Study in Mercantilism (Helsingfors, 1923), 72–73.Google Scholar
- Cited in Lars Magnusson, Mercantilism: The Shaping of an Economic Language (London: Routledge, 1994), 162. Bacon, though, was quick to point out, along with Machiavelli, that money is decidely not the sinews of war: “Neither is money the sinews of war (as it is trivially said), where the sinews of men’s arms, in base and effeminate people, are failing.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Francis Bacon, “Of the True Greatness of Kingdoms and Estates,” in Francis Bacon: The Essays, ed. and intro. John Pitcher (London: Pengin Books, 1985), 148.Google Scholar
- Eli F. Heckscher, Mercantilism, 2 vols., trans. Mendel Shapiro (London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd., 1935), 2: 138–139.Google Scholar
- Henry Dunning Macleod, Principles of Economical Philosophy, 2 vols. (London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1872–1875), 1: 50, cited in Suviranta, The Theory of the Balance of Trade, 115.Google Scholar
- Adam Smith, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of The Wealth of Nations, ed. Edwin Cannan (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1976), 4.1, 472, cited in Suviranta, The Theory of The Balance of Trade, 115.Google Scholar
- All citations taken from William Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice, ed. Brents Stirling (Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books, 1990). All citations are noted in text.Google Scholar
- Richard Halpern, Shakespeare Among the Moderns (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997), 190.Google Scholar
- Bernard Grebanier, The Truth About Shylock (New York: Random House, 1962), 250–251.Google Scholar
- Hugo Grotius, The Law of War and Peace, trans. Francis W. Kelsey (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1925), 2.12, 351.Google Scholar
- I owe much of this summary of the usury debates to Norman Jones, God and the Moneylenders: Usury and Law in Early Modern England (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989); and R.H. Tawney’s introduction to his edition of Thomas Wilson’s Discourse Upon Usury, intro. and ed. R.H. Tawney (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1925).Google Scholar
- See also John T. Noonan, The Scholastic Analysis of Usury (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957);Google Scholar
- and Benjamin Nelson, The Idea of Usury (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1969).Google Scholar
- C.L. Barber, Shakespeare’s Festive Comedy: A Study of Dramatic Form and its Relation to Social Custom (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1958), 168.Google Scholar
- A.D. Moody, “The Letter of the Law,” in The Merchant of Venice: Critical Essay, ed. Thomas Wheeler (New York: Garland Publishing, 1991), 86.Google Scholar
- René Girard, A Theater of Envy: William Shakespeare (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 246.Google Scholar
- Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995), 82.Google Scholar
- For a foundational essay on the role of New Testament morality in the play, see Barbara K. Lewalski, “Biblical Allusion and Allegory in The Merchant of Venice,” Shakespeare Quarterly 13 (1962): 327–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karen Newman, “Portia’s Ring: Unruly Women and Structures of Exchange in The Merchant of Uenice,” Shakespeare Quarterly 38 (1987): 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Claude Levi-Strauss, Introduction to the Work of Marcel Mauss, in The Logic of the Gift, ed. Alan Schrift (New York: Routledge, 1997), 55–56.Google Scholar
- Northrop Frye, The Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971), 162.Google Scholar
- On the “two worlds” of comedy, see Elliot Krieger, A Marxist Study of Shakespeare’s Comedies (London: Macmillan Press, 1979), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ernst Bloch, The Utopian Function of Art and Literature: Selected Essays, trans. Jack Zipes and Frank Mecklenburg (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996), 41.Google Scholar
- Arthur O. Lovejoy, The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971), 3–23.Google Scholar
- I owe much of my understanding of Lovejoy’s notion of the genesis of ideas to Michael Bristol’s excellent overview of Lovejoy’s study in Michael D. Bristol, Shakespeare’s America, America’s Shakespeare (London: Routledge, 1990), 145–151.Google Scholar
- See Georges Bataille, “The Notion of Expenditure,” in Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927–1939, trans. Allan Stoekl, with Carlo Lovitt and Donald M. Leslie, Jr. (Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1985), 116–129.Google Scholar
- For a critique of Bataille’s theory of expenditure, see Barbara Herrnstein Smith, Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspective for Critical Theory (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988), 134–149.Google Scholar
In contrast to this however, modern attitudes to racism, in particular anti-Semitism, are different. All throughout history Jews have been persecuted, most recently in the Holocaust in Germany. I would think that many people today would be affected by this, that such persecution could happen just because people stood up for their faith. It is this view that makes 'The Merchant of Venice', and particularly Shylock, so complex and still extremely relevant to modern society. Shylock is a Jew in a Christian city, isolated and vulnerable. This is a cause of great prejudice against Shylock and means his apparent villainy can begin to be understood. But, interpretation of Act 1:3 and the lines therein and underlying meanings accounts for many things. For example, when Bassanio invites Shylock to have a meal with them, 'If it please you to dine with us', it can be read as a kind offer rejected by Shylock or ignorance of the Jewish faith, either unintentionally or intentionally to patronise and provoke Shylock. But one point in this very important scene, Act 1:3, is when Shylock recounts all he has suffered at the hands of the Christians, epitomised in Antonio. Shylock has 'borne it with a patient shrug' and goes on to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the supposed